home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: Norm.Barrett@f222.n2613.z1.fidonet.org (Norm Barrett)
- Path: ceas.rochester.edu!rochgte!UUCP
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: RE: Supra with or without
- Message-ID: <829268924.AA00553@rochgte.fidonet.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 22:30:00 -0500
- X-FTN-To: Bill Alexander
-
- ====================================================================== From:
- BILL ALEXANDER Conference: 25 , AMIHDWR
- To: ALL Message: 341 Reply To: 0
- Subj: Supra with or without Fla Date: 04-09-96 Time: 18:40
- ======================================================================
- > Organization: National Institutes of Health
- > I'm getting my A2000 onto the WWW and want to know if the extra expense
- > of
- > the SupraFAX 28.8 V.34 Ext model with the flash roms is worth it? The
- > SupraEXPRESS 288 PnP (for windoze) is about 75% the cost of the flash
- > rom
- > model. Also any info on how often flash rom updates are posted would
- > be
- > appreciated.
- > I would like to support Supra since they are still supporting the
- > Amiga.
- > Regards,
- I bought the EXT Fax model of the Supra 288. I wish I'd saved my money
-
- All the features are only for Windows machines. OK the case is better, and if
- I ever get a IBM clone, I could use the Fax, Caller ID software and the like.
-
- If supra was really supporting the AMIGA they would sell a version with at
- least GP fax included. It cost you an extra 50 bucks. Even if you buy the
- Fax version of the modem.
-
- Norm Barrett Rochester, NY
-
-
-
- ** UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY - PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHAREWARE CONCEPT **
- -=-
- | AmiQWK 2.5 | My wallet's cache is disabled.
-
-